The Outspokin’ Cyclist: Can mountain bikers be green?

Phillip Barron
The Herald Sun

DURHAM — Many mountain bikers pick up the sport as another way to spend time in the woods. But not all trails let an environmentally conscious rider enjoy the ride.

Improperly built trails soon develop deep ruts in the ground and can damage sensitive vegetation, especially if those trails are carved through low-lying areas that stay wet. Perhaps worse are the poorly constructed stunt zones where deep holes are dug or wooden structures are built hastily. If built of untreated lumber, these structures quickly rot becoming both neighborhood blight and safety hazards.

Trails like these exist in the Triangle, though they are usually pirated trails with quasi-legal status. If you ride much in the area, you know which ones I’m talking about.

It doesn’t have to be this way; mountain biking and environmental protection go hand in hand. Since the so-called Park City Agreement in 1994 with the International Mountain Biking Association (IMBA), the Sierra Club has recognized mountain biking as a positive, worthwhile outdoor activity. Raleigh resident Bill Camp sums it up best — “mountain biking is a good way for families to spend time together participating in a healthy activity together.”

Building environmentally sustainable mountain bike trails is not only possible; through organized education efforts, it’s quickly become preferable. Car-manufacturer Subaru and IMBA co-sponsor two Trail Care Crew teams who annually travel the country preaching the gospel of sustainable trails. Their Trailbuilding Schools have taught more than 150,000 people how to build trails right the first time so that they’ll last forever.

Jill Van Winkle and Chris Bernhardt, IMBA’s east coast Trail Care Crew visited the Triangle in March 2005. The class was packed with volunteers, land managers, and park officials all hungry to learn how to build trails that will withstand the impact of the growing sport. At the end of the weekend, Bernhardt said he was impressed by the local commitment to sustainable trail-building, specifically Durham’s Little River Regional Park’s singletrack.

Well-built trails draw people to them. The more fat tires turn out on trails, more people will be there to protect wooded areas from development. Unsustainable development, here in the Southeast, is the single largest earth-scarring activity. Our fetish for new strip-malls anchored by big-box retail chains has meant the demise of many favorite homegrown trail systems.

The leadership of the Triangle Off Road Cyclists (TORC) is keenly aware that sprawl threatens access to local trials. “That’s one of the reasons TORC was formed,” says Camp, who is president of the advocacy group. Through fun events like last month’s Fat Tire Festival, Camp hopes to “raise awareness of our trails advocacy and volunteer efforts to build and maintain legal singletrack in the Triangle area.”

TORC has its work cut out. Right now, sights are set on new trails – conceived through memoranda of understanding with the landowners and built by volunteers — from northern Wake County down to Chatham County. Thanks to TORC’s lobbying efforts, developers’ masterplans already include singletrack options at the city of Raleigh’s new Forest Ridge park as well as the new park to be developed after the North Wake Landfill closes.

The Briar Chapel subdivision in northern Chatham County is a model for developer/volunteer collaboration. By the time the first houses in the new subdivision go up for sale, the publicly accessible singletrack TORC is building also should be open for business.

In local and regional media outlets, TORC has received flattering media attention for its efforts to preserve established trail systems and grow new ones in a region of North Carolina where sprawl is the norm.

And mountain bikers are generally good stewards of the land. I know of no other sport (organized or otherwise) where the participants take on lobbying for, building, and maintaining their own recreational outlets with the same fervor and tenacity as mountain bikers. Since its inception in 1988, IMBA’s members have registered more than 1 million volunteer hours of trail work. Heck, every land manager I’ve ever met says that mountain bikers out-do all other volunteers when it comes to time spent with a McLeod rake or Pulaski in hand.

Park officials at Beaverdam State Park, Lake Crabtree County Park, and Harris Lake county Park say that on occasion mountain bikers have broken the rules and ridden closed trails but that it hasn’t become a problem. Cyclists respect the trails, says Drew Cade, Park Manager at Lake Crabtree.

Even when a vocal minority of environmentalists try to claim that mountain bikers are harmful to the trails, science is on the side of the cyclists. IMBA has gathered on its website an impressive array of independent scientific studies of the environmental effects of mountain biking, all of which reach the conclusion that mountain biking makes no more of an impact on the natural environment than hiking, horseback riding, or other recreational trail activities.

With the right priorities, including a TORC membership card in your pocket, you can ride local trails knowing that you’re doing it in the greenest way.

Now, if only we could grow our greenway and bike-lane infrastructure at the same pace, we could ride to trail-head and leave the car behind. But that’s another story.

 

interpreting Zidane’s head

Italy won the World Cup, but thanks to the press building up the final match as Zinedine Zidane’s swan song and their inability to wrap their minds around his senseless overtime headbutt, collective cognitive dissonance is all that remains. Few can stop talking about Zidane, but even fewer are saying anything.

Roger Cohen’s “Camus and Zidane Offer Views on How Things End” is one of the better attempts at interpreting Zizou’s headbutt. He concludes,

Zidane, it seems, lost his head. Or perhaps he kept his head and chose to write a coda to his story that would have all the complexity of a great novel. Perhaps he sought an almost unseen act of anger that would prompt a global, virtual argument about the merits or demerits of a gesture without sense.

Maybe he didn’t want the fairytale ending to his career that the New York Times built up on the Saturday before the Sunday final.

This morning I received by email the following interpretation, which as of yet, is one of the best.

Zidane’s headbutt, as seen by

the Germans

the French

the Italians

the United States

the press

 
Tags: ,

The Outspokin’ Cyclist: Some athletes lose sight of sportsmanship of biking

Phillip Barron
The Herald Sun

Jan Ulrich and Ivan Basso lost their bids for the yellow jersey to Operation Puerta before this year’s Tour de France even began.

Operation Puerta isn’t a new contender for victory; it’s a six-month doping investigation and arguably the most significant doping scandal of bicycle racing. Thanks to OP, thirteen professional riders were kicked out of the race and more than forty others are involved in a continuing investigation.

Around the same time Operation Puerta’s news was breaking, Lance Armstrong was wrapping up his latest victory. He settled a libel suit with a British newspaper that had accused him of using banned drugs to speed his recovery from cancer and boost him to a Tour de France victory in 1999.

What’s at issue when cyclists are accused of doping is whether or not professional athletes have cheated. The Tour de France is a stage race, spanning nearly a month with riders covering up to 130 miles per day with brutal climbing stages in the Alps and Pyrenees. Since stage races in cycling are tests of endurance and aerobic strength, cheating methods revolve around ways to increase the rider’s aerobic efficiency.

Did Lance use EPO? Did Jan Ulrich freeze his own blood for a transfusion at a later time? What would it matter if they did? More plainly, what’s wrong with doping anyway?

The superficial answer is that doping is against the rules. Every professional sport has a governing body that establishes the rules of the sport and the conditions under which athletes may compete. Doping is breaking the rules of the game. In a sense, it’s like goaltending in basketball or slide-tackling in soccer.

But goaltending or slide-tackling can happen by accident, whereas doping is intentional. That’s why the penalty for doping is more serious than giving the other team a foul shot or a free kick.

Doping is rule-breaking that you try desperately and secretly to get away with. An athlete caught doping will usually have gone to elaborate lengths to hide it.

In other words, doping is cheating.

For a more meaningful answer to the question what’s wrong with doping, we have to see sport in a more meaningful context. And to do this, we turn to the arbiters of meaning – philosophers.

In The Philosophical Athlete, Heather Reid says that all sports have moments of challenge — “times when an athlete finds him- or herself alone, faced with a particular task and the very real possibilities of success or failure.”

It is these moments of challenge that make sport meaningful. Whether or not you can rise to the challenge – whether the challenge is to make the free throw, outrun a defender, or beat the current best time in a bicycle race — is a matter of discipline and skill. Whether you can do so while respecting your opponents is a matter of personal integrity.

An athlete who dopes disrespects him or herself as well as his/her competitors, officials, and fans.

Without opponents there wouldn’t be any competitive sports. Using drugs or blood transfusions to gain an advantage over your competitors is to disrespect your competitors by ignoring the rules of game. Without a competitor, there is no opportunity to win. Opponents are necessary to play the game or race the race. So, respect for your competitors is what fairness in sport is based on.

Cheating (or doping) enters the picture when the desire to win the game supplants the desire to be an athlete who is worthy of winning.

Pop culture’s values may be different. On reality TV or in a culture of on-demand instant gratification, cheating is more a strategy to get ahead of your competitor than the forbidden alternative. Indeed, in these nihilistic venues getting caught, rather than cheating, is the sign of weakness.

But the concepts of respect and fairness, archaic as they may sound to some, are still what sport is based on. Training is a performance enhancing activity done in earnest. Preparing for a race, there is no substitute (physically or morally) for practice. If sport is a measure of physical discipline, mental toughness, and moral determination, then cheating leaves us unworthy of playing the game (much less winning).

Without Jan Ulrich, David Zabriske, Ivan Basso, Floyd Landis, or George Hincapie racing against him, Lance Armstrong’s seven Tour de France victories would be meaningless. They also would have been meaningless if he hadn’t developed the muscle-tone or dexterous precision needed to rocket his body and bike across the French countryside.

 

wheel guitar


by Ken Butler

 
Tags:

there’s gonna be some changes ’round here

I’ve just installed a new platform, and I’m working on a new site design. I appreciate your patience in the meantime.

If you find anything not working (broken links, etc), please let me know.

 

finish the American Tobacco Trail

Below is a message from the durhambikeandped listserv. It’s a request to sign a petition which asks the city of Durham to finish building its part of the American Tobacco Trail. The petition was written by Bill Bussey, President of the Triangle Rails to Trails Conservancy.

Please take a moment to sign this petition. It doesn’t take much to sign it, and the benefit to the Triangle of a completed ATT will be immeasurable.

Once you’ve signed it, please send it on to your friends so that they too can add their voices.

If you’d like more information about the durhambikeandped listserv (or you want to join), visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/durhambikeandped/

Hi Durham Bike and Ped List Member and American Tobacco Trail Supporter,

We’ve set up an online petition asking Durham City Staff and Officials to complete the American Tobacco Trail in Durham.

Here is the link for you in text form: http://www.petitiononline.com/att2/petition.html

This is the same petition which was available for signature at the Festival for the Eno last weekend. Over 400 folks signed it! If you are among those that did sign the Festival printed petition, you are welcome to sign this one as well. Or not! Do as you please. Do note that you can leave comments on this online petition that you could not with the printed material.

The petition is self explanatory, so I won’t include more here.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments about this. Please call at my phone below if you’d prefer.

Also, please pass this link http://www.petitiononline.com/att2/petition.html along to other groups or persons who you think have an interest in the American Tobacco Trail.

Thank you for your continued hard work on and support for the American Tobacco Trail.

Happy Trails

Bill Bussey
President
Triangle Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
americantobaccotrail@earthlink.net
919 545-9104

As of this posting, there are 105 signatures. Let’s see what we can do about that.

 
Tags: ,